Comments on: Google Reader shared items – nice idea, badly thought out http://www.googletutor.com/2007/12/16/google-reader-shared-items-nice-idea-badly-thought-out/ Your how-to guide for Google with Google tutorials, tips for using Google and advice. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:07:09 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: mARSHAL SANDLER http://www.googletutor.com/2007/12/16/google-reader-shared-items-nice-idea-badly-thought-out/#comment-191354 mARSHAL SANDLER Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:15:54 +0000 http://www.googletutor.com/2007/12/16/google-reader-shared-items-nice-idea-badly-thought-out/#comment-191354 It is a cumbersome affair but can be corrected ! It seems many engineering types are not people- people, there is a difference between talking to a than a person than a machine ! Teche's who can communicate with people develop Netvibes, Lijit,Mixx.Magnolia ! It amazed me that Google who based a system on Math, Semantics ,and General Semantics, create semantic jazz in their latest effort ! Google Tech's are not stupid they will get it to work right ! how about D-Googleing ! It is a cumbersome affair but can be corrected ! It seems many engineering types are not people- people, there is a difference between talking to a than a person than a machine ! Teche’s who can communicate with people develop Netvibes, Lijit,Mixx.Magnolia ! It amazed me that Google who based a system on Math, Semantics ,and General Semantics, create semantic jazz in their latest effort ! Google Tech’s are not stupid they will get it to work right ! how about D-Googleing !

]]> By: Misinterpreted http://www.googletutor.com/2007/12/16/google-reader-shared-items-nice-idea-badly-thought-out/#comment-191219 Misinterpreted Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:41:22 +0000 http://www.googletutor.com/2007/12/16/google-reader-shared-items-nice-idea-badly-thought-out/#comment-191219 Very informative, thanks. It's a shame Google hasn't made this service as simple and straightforward as it could be. I understand from a business perspective why they'd want to keep thing in-house, but you make perfect sense about how Google might end up pushing people away. I recently read about how Google was experimenting with users being able to vote on search results. At this stage, no one but you would benefit from your own votes (unlike Digg). But maybe this could lead to something like Diggoogle. Whatever happens, I'm sure it will be a while before all the kinks are worked out. Very informative, thanks. It’s a shame Google hasn’t made this service as simple and straightforward as it could be. I understand from a business perspective why they’d want to keep thing in-house, but you make perfect sense about how Google might end up pushing people away.

I recently read about how Google was experimenting with users being able to vote on search results. At this stage, no one but you would benefit from your own votes (unlike Digg). But maybe this could lead to something like Diggoogle. Whatever happens, I’m sure it will be a while before all the kinks are worked out.

]]>