<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it online suicide to show Google the door?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/</link>
	<description>Your how-to guide for Google with Google tutorials, tips for using Google and advice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:10:55 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keilaron</title>
		<link>http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/#comment-181387</link>
		<dc:creator>Keilaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/#comment-181387</guid>
		<description>Pfft. How about &#039;no effect&#039;?
Honestly, it makes no sense to go all emo about pagerank, much less going all emo about it then blocking the same engine that&#039;s giving you the pagerank (no matter how low it&#039;s gone).
Logic is not at work here.

The problem here is simple: If you depend on a single source, even if it&#039;s Google, you are doomed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pfft. How about &#8216;no effect&#8217;?<br />
Honestly, it makes no sense to go all emo about pagerank, much less going all emo about it then blocking the same engine that&#8217;s giving you the pagerank (no matter how low it&#8217;s gone).<br />
Logic is not at work here.</p>
<p>The problem here is simple: If you depend on a single source, even if it&#8217;s Google, you are doomed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/#comment-179907</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googletutor.com/2007/11/14/is-it-online-suicide-to-show-google-the-door/#comment-179907</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for the spotlight.

There also another side to the story. Google, or at least the &quot;search engine&quot; part of it would have no content at all without webmasters.

Yes it was true that I was upset about recent Page Rank reduction. However I also free more than maybe other bloggers to experiment with things- even though sometime they may look a little drastic.

Of course I would discourage to follow my example if your earnings depend on SERPS or AdSense.

I do believe that any website that uses RSS technology can very easily survive without search engines these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for the spotlight.</p>
<p>There also another side to the story. Google, or at least the &#8220;search engine&#8221; part of it would have no content at all without webmasters.</p>
<p>Yes it was true that I was upset about recent Page Rank reduction. However I also free more than maybe other bloggers to experiment with things- even though sometime they may look a little drastic.</p>
<p>Of course I would discourage to follow my example if your earnings depend on SERPS or AdSense.</p>
<p>I do believe that any website that uses RSS technology can very easily survive without search engines these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
