An objective look at the Google Scholar

Written by: Peter Jalbert on Friday, May 4th, 2007
Posted to: Google, Scholar
3 comments, add yours!

The Internet is one of the best things I’ve ever encountered. Of all the portals out there, I like and use Google the most. It is not only a search engine, but the company made the portal into a tool that covers streamlined searches from news to blogs to even theses.

In college, the standard is to pass a thesis for one to be able to graduate. One of the components of this thesis is its review of related literature. These are composed of other studies that are related to one’s own paper, and also other info from online encyclopedias and dictionaries. To make things easier for me in my thesis research, I opted to research online. In just a few clicks, I got what I needed. More information that I would get, if  I took an hour or two to comb through the shelves in a traditional library.

One of the most helpful things for formerly lazy students like me would be the studies uploaded by professional researchers and the theses of Master’s and Doctorate students. What I did before was to look for studies uploaded by the likes of Ingenta or FindArticles, on Google. My searches were made easier when I started using Google Scholar. With searches that showed exclusive results on studies, theses, journals, books and other academic material, my research became more streamlined. In short, Google Scholar became one of the main tools in my thesis research.

However, though the help from Google Scholar was excellent, I have one major complaint. It’s that there are salient and highly relevant results that need to be paid for to be accessed. The stuff from the likes of Ingenta, Blackwell-Synergy and FindArticles are priced at $20 up. I know that it’s worth it, that it’s made from the blood, sweat and tears of other people, but for a formerly struggling student such as myself, such a price to pay could be too high for just a single article. I need other articles to use, too.

But still, there’s a silver lining. One can always use the abstracts that are offered on the results, free of charge. And if there’s one thing that’s great with Google Scholar results, it’s that some books offer previews of their content. It’s just that they’re either in .jpeg or .pdf format, which makes it hard for one to lift it directly from the browser to the word processor. But if you’re patient in taking notes, or if you have another computer, you can look up the results on one pc/mac, then type it up on the other machine. Just remember to cite, cite and cite. Plagiarism is very rampant, and if you’re still a student, it gives you the risk of academic consequences.

Google Scholar could also be used for those who make eBooks. Backed with solid theory, getting ideas from others’ brilliance, then you may be able to churn out an excellent piece of work that will surely impress your clients.

So if you need a tool for your online research needs, look no further, there’s Google Scholar for you!

Don't miss another post! Subscribe by RSS feed or by email today!

Share This   3 comments, add yours!

3 Responses to “An objective look at the Google Scholar”

  1. jeffon 06 May 2007 at 9:51 am

    Google Scholar is an amazing tool. I would really like to see it included as part of my Web History results. As it is, I tend to keep browser tabs open so that I can “save” recent searches - it would be really nice to have access to all of my past Scholar searches all of the time.

    As for paid access to articles: if you’re a student, you may be able to get free access to a lot of those articles by using the Library Links feature on the preferences page. If it’s something you haven’t tried yet, go ahead and see if it works for you. You may be surprised at what you can get for free - I certainly was, especially since I was considering purchasing an ACM membership before I discovered this feature. :)

  2. jccalhounon 06 May 2007 at 4:15 pm

    Google scholar integrates nicely with a lot of university libraries so that if you are on campus or are connected to the university through vpn it is possible to get nearly all of those articles for free if your university subscribes to them.

    However, the fact remains that although these databased are “made from the blood, sweat and tears of other people” these companies are little more than leaches. Scholars get paid nothing when they publish and in fact at the very least they have to subscribe to the journal before the journal will publish them. In some cases the journal will even make you pay a large amount for the privilege of getting published. Then most journals routinely take the copyright on articles and sell access to the articles to companies like ingenta or ebsco who then charge outrageous fees for an individual article. So everyone is profiting monetarily from the work of the scholars except the scholars themselves.

  3. LOBOon 07 May 2007 at 9:58 pm

    We have been having “broken links” nightmares since we ‘upgraded’ to Blogger Beta.

    Formerly, we were the number 1 “Predator Press” link … now we are pulling down less than 20 percent of the traffic we used to a year ago.

    Can you point me at some good advice? I would be THRILLED to give you a link and full-fledged ‘props’ …