Picasa: the Good and the Bad

Written by: Peter Jalbert on Sunday, April 29th, 2007
Posted to: Picasa
6 comments, add yours!

If you like photos, and you need to crop, edit out the red eyes, or just do basic effects on your pics but you have only 256MB of RAM and a 700MHz processor, making your Adobe Photoshop experience a worse pain than having a wisdom tooth grow out, then Google Picasa is the answer for you.

It is a relatively lighter photo archiving and editing program which allows you to do a lot of the basic functions of a photo editor and more, without the annoying lag time on an ancient machine.

Compared to Adobe Photoshop, it is better in some aspects, namely:

  • It has photo archiving and organizing functions.
  • It has a media detector. As soon as new media is detected on removable media or on the hard drive as it is introduced into the OS, the media detector opens an option to add the files to the library.
  • It is much, much lighter on the system: it loads faster, and the editing on a low-juice (low RAM, low CPU speed) machine takes less jugular vein popping than Adobe Photoshop.

What I really like about Picasa is that it:

  • Takes less brain cells to edit pictures.
  • It has a clean interface that evokes calmness and peace.
  • As I said, it is faster and lighter than Adobe Photoshop.
  • You can publish your photos automatically to your blog.

However, there are drawbacks, and it does have photo editing limitations, as compared to Adobe Photoshop.

  • Sometimes, the archiving is messy. The media organizing gets messy because of the automatic archiving. Picasa just assigns directories, especially if you’re clueless about how to operate it, as a first-time user.
  • The interface is too complicated for me, sometimes.
  • When you’ve edited or organized photos from Picasa, it creates and embeds extra files in folders. So unless you chose to hide the system files, it gets annoying and paranoia-inducing to see the files. Not to mention they take up hard drive space. Well, it’s only around 1KB anyway, but still. As for inducing paranoia, if you are allergic to malware, and if you didn’t realize that that system file was Picasa’s, you’d think that it’s one of those viruses that overrun your system with desktop.ini files.
  • It is not available for Mac and Linux! Having wiped out all traces of Microsoft Windows from my desktop, I cannot use Picasa anymore. I don’t even know whether I can run Picasa from a Windows emulator on Linux or OS X. So sad. My only consolation is that Windows 98 boxes can’t use it either.

Its system requirements are:

  • 300MHz processor
  • 64 MB RAM (128MB is better)
  • 50 MB available hard disk space (better if it’s 100MB)
  • 800 × 600 pixels, 16 bit color monitor.
  • Microsoft® Windows 2000, or Microsoft® Windows XP.
  • Microsoft® Internet Explorer 5.01 or better (6.0 is better).
  • Microsoft® DirectX 7.0 or higher (8.1 ships with XP, DirectX 9.0b is better for Picasa).
  • Optional: 56K Internet connection speed or better (for access to any online services).

Overall, Picasa is a fair program. It may lack the fine photo editing features of Adobe Photoshop, but it packs punch nonetheless. If you want to auto-publish on the Internet, organize and archive your photos, and do simple editing and tweaking on your pics, Google Picasa is a fine program to give you these and more.

Try Picasa yourself and let me know waht you think, it’s part of the free Google Pack –


Don't miss another post! Subscribe by RSS feed or by email today!

Share this post!   6 comments, add yours!

6 Responses to “Picasa: the Good and the Bad”

  1. Peteron 02 May 2007 at 11:56 pm

    Good and fair review. I will recheck it out as previously had problems with using it in blogger.

  2. Matton 03 May 2007 at 2:01 am

    Actually, Picasa is available for Linux:
    http://picasa.google.com/linux/

    Not sure how you missed this… :)

  3. Alistairon 03 May 2007 at 3:24 am

    There is a version for Linux, its just slightly behind the windows version so doesnt upload to web albumns

  4. GT Staffon 03 May 2007 at 10:03 pm
    oh. my bad. i had installed picasa before on my winxp partition.. but i wiped out my winxp on my desktop, and when i went back to the picasa page, the sys req’s said that it’s good only for windows… thank you for the tip. :D

    at least i need not reinstall windows for now. :D i just haaaate windows. :p

  5. […] is a photo organization, manipulation and uploading suite to compliment your Picasa Web Album. Google Tutor gave a review of the app good and fair review. As for my two cents’ worth, I’d simply give this application 4 out of 5 […]

  6. Patrickon 12 May 2008 at 9:12 am

    Does having a Picasa Web Album a way to archive my photos? Are the photos on the web just a link to the photos on my hard drive? If my PC crashed, could I still download the photos?

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply